SC/ST GRIEVANCE CELL

Tantia University, Sri Ganganagar

Objectives

The objective of the Grievance Cell is to develop a responsive and accountable attitude among all the stakeholders in order to maintain a harmonious educational atmosphere in the University.

A Grievance Cell should be constituted for the redressal of the problems reported by the SC/ST Students or Staff of the University with the following objectives:

  • Making admission contrary to merit determined in accordance with the declared admission policy of the institute;
  • Irregularity in the admission process adopted by the University;
  • Refusing admission in accordance with the declared admission policy of the University;
  • Non publication of prospectus, as specified;
  • Publishing any information in the prospectus, which is false or misleading, and not based on facts;
  • Withhold or refuse to return any document in the form of certificates of degree, diploma or any other award or other document deposited with it by a person for the purpose of seeking admission in such institution, with a view to induce or compel such person to pay any fee or fees in respect of any course or program of study which such person does not intend to pursue;
  • Demand of money in excess of that specified in the declared admission policy or approved by the competent authority to be charged by such University;
  • Breach of the policy for reservation in admission as may be applicable;
  • Complaints, of alleged discrimination of students, from the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, Women, Minority or Disabled categories;
  • Non payment or delay in payment of scholarships to any student that such institution is committed, under the conditions imposed by University Grants Commission, or by any other authority;
  • Delay in conduct of examinations or declaration of results beyond that specified in the academic calendar;
  • On provision of student amenities as may have been promised or required to be provided by the institution;
  • Denial of quality education as promised at the time of admission or required to be provided;
  • Non transparent or unfair evaluation practices;
  • Harassment and victimization of students, including sexual harassment;